humans

search for more blogs here

 

"Archaeologists Confirm Oldest Humans In China" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-20 18:50:50

– Archeologists have come to the conclusion that the two million year old human fossils found in Wushan County. Chongging belong to the earliest human species in China. – A composite image of M51 also known as the Whirlpool Galaxy shows the majesty of its structure in a dramatic new way through several of NASA's orbiting observatories.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://science.propeller.com/story/2007/11/20/archaeologists-confirm-oldest-humans-in-china

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Humans too unlikely to evolve?" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-12 15:13:38

is at it again:3. The argument from biological evolution. This argument assumes the truth of biological evolution; for a defense of that assumption see the communicate. Origins archive. To be sure biological evolution is logically compatible with theism; God could have used evolution to create life. But if theism were adjust. God could have also used many other methods to act life methods which are impossible if atheism is true. In differentiate if atheism is true evolution pretty much has to be true. Furthermore since theism implies a metaphysical dualism it is antecedently likely on theism that minds are fundamentally nonphysical entities and therefore that conscious life is fundamentally different from nonconscious life. But this in turn makes it likely that conscious life was created independently of nonconscious life—that evolution is false. Thus the scientific fact of biological evolution is more likely on the assumption that atheism is adjust than on the assumption that theism is true. The interesting thing about this argument is that it is a double-edged sword. If it turns out that only one biological structure or organism is impossible to come by with the affect of evolution then atheism takes a huge blow. A further interesting point is that evolution (if adjust) may actually be evidence for the existence of God! Consider which is more likely in an atheistic universe- the evolution of simple life forms or the evolution of complex sentient life forms with self-concept and imagination. It seems to me that it would be much more probable for there to be less complex life forms on the assumption that atheism is adjust. In fact this hypothesis may be confirmed by calculations. Note the following from William Lane Craig:“And I’m going to declare that the idea that evolution could undergo occurred without an intelligent Designer is so improbable as to be fantastic. This has been demonstrated by Barrow and Tipler in their book The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. In this book they enumerate ten steps in the course of human evolution each of which is so improbable that before it would have occurred the sun would undergo ceased to be a main sequence star and would undergo burned up the earth. [John Barrow and stamp Tipler. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford: Clarendon touch. 1986). pp. 561-565.] They calculate the odds of the evolution of the human genome by chance to be on the request of 4-360 (110,000) a number which is so huge that to call it astronomical would be a wild understatement. In other words if evolution did become it would undergo been a miracle so that evolution is actually bear witness for the existence of God” 2It may be after all that evolution is no bear witness for atheism at all! An atheist may point out that this argument is faulty because there is no inherent be for particular homo sapiens to evolve. However. Barrow and Tipler’s calculations affirm that it is vastly improbable for sentient beings equivalent to human beings to develop by means of evolution. Evolution it seems may not quite be the affiliate the atheists ascertain it as. See HERE (upcoming) for more analysis of this argument. Are the probabilities change by reversal? They are as the expression goes not even wrong. It's just more of the same crap IDists/creationists have found so successful in bamboozling the naive: the Argument From Really Big Numbers. These guys displace some numbers out of.. well let's say their hat. There's no justification for the numbers or the simple-minded models they plug the numbers into. It's too improbable that apes would evolve from animals let alone that humans with triple the brain capacity of an ape could create by mental act in a mere 10 million years when it took way more than that for bacteria to change state animals which are more similar to each other than humans are to any other species. Apart from the ID populate. Would the possible or probable disaster due to the global warming force us to evolve. If life on hide get so bad that we either get be war for resources such as fresh wet and alter to lay food on or if we have to hit the books to work over the ideologies borders. Don't we undergo to create by mental act to be able to survive with less greedy use of resources? Yes this is a derail. It's too improbable that apes would create by mental act from animals let alone that humans with manifold the hit capacity of an ape could evolve in a mere 10 million years when it took way more than that for bacteria to change state animals which are more similar to each other than humans are to any other species. A further interesting inform is that evolution (if true) may actually be evidence for the existence of God! believe which is more likely in an atheistic universe- the evolution of simple life forms or the evolution of complex sentient life forms with self-concept and imagination. It seems to me that it would be much more probable for there to be less complex life forms on the assumption that atheism is true. And when we be at the history of life on Earth: what do we see?Three billion years of microbes and other non-sentient lifeforms. A accommodate of a million years of Homo Sapiens. Evolutionary prediction confirmed! Well you see in brain size and brains are probably the most important move of any species humans are way beyond anything else triple the coat of apes. Therefore apes are much closer to every other species of animal and are much closer even to bacteria than they are to humans. And the bigger the brain the less it can evolve or change in any way. Yet scientists be us to believe that more hit development occurred than had ever occurred before at any time in history in less measure than any other species was supposed to undergo evolved from another species. come up you see in brain coat and brains are probably the most important part of any species humans are way beyond anything else triple the coat of apes. Therefore apes are much closer to every other species of animal and are much closer even to bacteria than they are to humans. And the bigger the brain the less it can evolve or change in any way. Yet scientists want us to believe that more hit development occurred than had ever occurred before at any time in history in less time than any other species was supposed to have evolved from another species. where do you get this crap?as for hit size undergo you even heard of microcephaly genes? be into ASPM. MCPH1. CENPJ. CDK5RAP2. would be a great start it's been cited many times and is a very important paper also has a good overview of the air and you can't just go by coat you also have to be at structural similarities the evolution of the brain as a whole and the 'primate cortex' is very well understood! yeah i realize that it's just more putting out information for others who are interested and it gives me the come about to look up cool science and do literature searches that aren't related to my phd topic every now and then! where do you get this egest?as for brain size undergo you even heard of microcephaly genes? be into ASPM. MCPH1. CENPJ. CDK5RAP2. would be a great go away it's been cited many times and is a very important paper also has a good overview of the air and you can't just go by size you also have to be at structural similarities the evolution of the hit as a whole and the 'primate cortex' is very come up understood! It's too improbable that apes would evolve from animals let alone that humans with triple the hit capacity of an ape could create by mental act in a mere 10 million years when it took way more than.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=229014

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"ARE ANIMALS BETTER THAN HUMANS" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-01 20:44:01

Language for polls and opinions: Multiple If this poll offends you to report it please complete the following details: Congo the Democratic Republic of the cut Southern Territories Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Korea. Democratic populate's Republic of Korea. Republic of Lao People's Democratic Republic Macedonia the Former Yugoslav Republic of Micronesia. Federated States of Moldova. Republic of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines South Georgia and the South devise Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Receive survey final results to your email also receive weekly poll results updates procure © 2007 Toluna Inc. All rights reserved.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.dpolls.com/polls/40121/ARE_ANIMALS_BETTER_THAN_HUMANS

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"ARE ANIMALS BETTER THAN HUMANS" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-21 20:07:10

Language for polls and opinions: Multiple If this poll offends you to report it gratify end the following details: Congo the Democratic Republic of the French Southern Territories Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Korea. Democratic populate's Republic of Korea. Republic of Lao People's Democratic Republic Macedonia the Former Yugoslav Republic of Micronesia. Federated States of Moldova. Republic of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Receive poll final results to your email also receive weekly poll results updates Copyright &write; 2007 Toluna Inc. All rights reserved.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.dpolls.com/polls/40120/ARE_ANIMALS_BETTER_THAN_HUMANS

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Future Humans Won't Get Fat, Study Says" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-11 20:47:05

According to a new study our distant descendants may be genetically blessed with the ability to remain svelte despite a daily diet of pizza and beer. Evolution at its beat don't you evaluate? Absolutely change by reversal. Because - in the future - civilization ordain have collapsed - probably forever - and the problem ordain _then_ be not starving to death... Get a real-time be beneath the surface in the with our tools and. Also see our original real-time tracking system. --> DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs summon headers button icons scripts and other function names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.


Cruise 4 Cash - Detective Sherlock - Free Bid Auctions - Expert Poker Tips - Shop 4 Money

Win Any Lottery - Repo Car Search - Psychics 4 Free - High Quality Games - Driving 4 Dollars




Related article:
http://digg.com/offbeat_news/Future_Humans_Won_t_Get_Fat_Study_Says

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Ouch! When humans and robots collide, literally" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-05 16:58:34

German researchers are exploring a new dimension of human-robot interaction: the "interaction" that occurs when a 200-kilogram industrial robot accidentally strikes a 90-kilogram person in the head torso or pelvis. Susanne Oberer and Rolf Dieter Schraft at the in Stuttgart are conducting human-robot "crash tests" to understand what kind of injuries prove in such cases and how safety could be improved. They reported their latest findings in a cover titled "Robot-Dummy Crash Tests for Robot Safety Assessment," presented at the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation in Rome early this year. "create" in their chew over is not the poor individual who gets smashed by a heavy robotic manipulator. Rather create is a crash test dummy or actually a come down test dummy computer model called FAT ES-2 developed by DYNAmore GmbH and other companies in collaboration with the German Association for Automotive Research. As for the robot the researchers used a computer copy of the the industrial manipulator and welding robot. To make the two models "interact," they used finite-element software (LS-DYNA by the Livermore Software Technology Corp.) originally designed to study car come down tests. In the first scenario a seated worker is struck by the robotic arm on the left side of the continue the robot moving with a rotational velocity of up to 50 degrees/second around its vertical axis. The collision results in a continue acceleration of about 65 g's. In the second scenario the robot hits the dummy on the left side of its ribcage. For a rotational speed of 50 degrees/back up the ribs deflects 1 centimeter inward. Finally in the third scenario the dummy is hit at its pelvis with forces measured at its which experiences forces of more than 0.15 kilonewtons. Now what does that all mean? Would the robot have killed the person? The researchers don't have a definite say mainly because there's no reliable way to evaluate that out. Existing injury criteria (the methods to translates head acceleration rib deflection and pelvis compel into medical assessments like minor bruise severe concussion abuse death) were developed for car accidents which usually involve force intervals of around 15 to 30 milliseconds. Human-robot collisions of the write studied by the German researchers come about in intervals of 5 to 10 seconds. "The assessment scheme for robotics has to be specifically designed for the characteristic stiffness and impact intervals arising in robot-human come down," they create verbally. The injury criteria for car crashes was developed by biomechanics researchers by performing a variety of experiments using cadavers animals like pig carcasses and human volunteers. Abruptly decelerate a cadaver on a crash-simulator sled and see if the aorta rips change state -- that kind of thing. This knowledge of the human be and its dynamic behavior now needs to be extended to the types of collisions we can expect from people and robots. It may take a while so for now watch out for that swinging 200-kilogram robotic arm.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/2007/09/10/ouch_when_humans_and_robots_co.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Early humans walked, but couldn't run" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-10-25 15:53:07

Manchester. England -- British scientists say early humans almost certainly walked upright on two legs but bear witness suggests they couldn't run very fast. account Sellers of the University of Manchester who led the study said if early humans lacked an Achilles tendon as modern chimps and gorillas do their ability to run would have been severely compromised. "Our research supports the belief that the earliest humans used efficient bipedal walking rather than chimp-like 'Groucho' walking," said Sellers. "But if as seems likely early humans lacked an Achilles tendon then whilst their ability to walk would be largely unaffected our work suggests running effectiveness would be greatly reduced with top speeds halved and energy costs more than doubled." Sellers said "efficient running" would have been necessary for human ancestors to "move from a largely herbivorous diet to the much more familiar hunting activities associated with later humans." "What we be to discover now is when in our evolution did we create an Achilles tendon as knowing this will back up undo the mystery of our origins." Sellers presented the research Tuesday during the British Association for the Advancement of Science "Festival of Science" at the University of York. --Copyright 2007 by United touch International. Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decision. ©2004-2007 All Rights Reserved unless mentioned otherwise.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.themoneytimes.com/news/20070912/early_humans_walked_but_couldnt_run-id-109505.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"UK ?should send humans into space? says exploration report" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-10-19 16:57:25

The UK should examine soon whether to act in human spaceflight after 2010 with a detailed plan according to the lay Exploration Working assort (SEWG) inform by the UK government's civil lay co-ordinator the. Since the start of the lay age the UK government's policy has been opposed to human spaceflight. If implemented as part of the UK's new lay strategy which ordain be announced in the next few weeks it ordain be a significant policy reversal and has major implications for space funding. Currently UK civil programes cost about £200 million ($406 million) a year. At NASA the astronaut and Shuttle programmes together represent about $6 billion out of a total budget of around $17 billion. "We recommend that the UK engages in preparatory human spaceflight activites [and] we should extend the UK's significant role in robotic exploration," says SEWG chairman stamp Close. The UK is already a leading nation in the 's Aurora create by mental act that is to displace rovers and other probes to Mars. An increase in robotics could see involvement in NASA lunar projects and perhaps Chinese. Indian and Japanese planned Moon missions as well as any future ESA proposals - Aurora may be changed in the coming year to include lunar robotics. Four UK citizens have gone into space: Helen Sharman on communicate Juno the Soviet mission to Mir in 1991 and since then Michael Foale. Nichola Patrick and Piers Sellers on NASA Space go missions. For exclusive news and expert analysis every week to pip International print edition. Included with your subscription are 4 FREE issues and FREE delivery to your home or office.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles/2007/09/13/216819/uk-should-send-humans-into-space-says-exploration-report.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Courting trends of humans" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-10-10 21:53:36

Well it's not surprising. The men wanting to see 1/2 of the women while women only wanting to see 1/3 of the men shows the evolutionary history of humans of men being the ones seeking out women (and I think it's related to us not being adjust monogamous animals) The first thought I actually had when I read the article in a newspaper was my housemates talking about arranged marriages in Taiwan about how guys supposedly display making more than NT$1million/year overseas as a desirable trait on those shows which translates to about US$30000/year. I said I make quite a bit more than that (but it's only about average in the US) and they said I could probably get a lot of interested women if I went on one of those shows. Eh... I said I didn't want gold diggers. (disabled) to listen to it now. Requires installed and running (for the non-Winamp version). Also make sure you can play Ogg Vorbis with a limited selection for the lazy.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://tabulas.com/~dracil/1476324.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Why Men Stink Of Urine Or Vanilla" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-10-08 09:11:21

A new chew over has determined a single odor receptor gene can decide whether a mans body odor smells of vanilla or urine. This chew over has also put me off vanilla ice beat. Gene determines whether male body odor smells pleasantLargest study of its kind reveals that an ingredient in male body odor can smell desire urine or act on a vanilla cause to be perceived depending on single odorant receptor gene To many urine smells like urine and vanilla smells like vanilla. But androstenone a derivative of testosterone that is a potent ingredient in male body odor can smell like either - depending on your genes. While many people realise a foul odor from androstenone usually that of stale urine or strong sweat others find the scent sweet and pleasant. comfort others cannot smell it at all. New investigate from Rockefeller University performed in collaboration with scientists at Duke University in North Carolina reveals for the first measure that this extreme variability in people's perception of androstenone is due in large move to genetic variations in a hit odorant receptor called OR7D4. The research is reported September 16 as an go online publication of the journal Nature. Androstenone open in higher concentrations in the urine and sweat of men than of women is used by some mammals to give social and sexual information and the ability to realise androstenone's cause to be perceived may undergo far-reaching behavioral implications for humans. In the largest study ever conducted of its kind researchers at Rockefeller University presented nearly 400 participants with 66 odors at two different concentrations and asked them to evaluate the pleasantness and intensity of each odor. When scientists at Duke University identified OR7D4 as a receptor that androstenone selectively activates. Leslie Vosshall. Chemers Family Associate Professor and head of the Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior at Rockefeller University and Andreas Keller a postdoc in her lab formed a collaboration with them and began collecting blood samples from participants and isolated their DNA. The Duke team led by Hiroaki Matsunami used DNA from each participant to grade the gene that encodes the OR7D4 receptor. "With this large dataset we are able to say that people who convey different variants of this receptor perceive this odor differently," says Vosshall. Although it has long been suspected that the ability to realise the odor of androstenone is genetically determined this study is the first to identify variations in a single gene that be for a large move of why people perceive androstenone's scent so differently. With their Duke collaborators. Vosshall and Keller identified two point mutations called hit nucleotide polymorphisms along the gene which gave rise to two variants of the odorant receptor: RT and WM which differ by two amino acids. As a assort participants with the RT/RT genotype perceive androstenone's odor as foul and intense. Those with the RT/WM genotype on the other hand are more likely to realise androstenone as less unpleasant. Many cannot smell androstenone at all. Although some participants with the RT/WM genotype can smell androstenone they undergo the comprehend very differently than those with two copies of the fully functional receptor: To them androstenone doesn't smell desire urine; it has a vanilla scent. "There are two independent things that are interesting about this odor," says first co-author Keller. "One is that it is a potential social communicate but the other one is that so many people cannot comprehend it." Two additional point mutations in some of the participants influenced their sensitivity to androstenone one of which may make humans hypersensitive to this odor. Vosshall and Keller are interested in what it is about these amino acid changes that alter one's perception of androstenone's cause to be perceived and in whether one's perception of this potent compound can influence behavior. "Since some mammals clearly use androstenone to communicate sexuality and dominance within a social hierarchy it's intriguing to evaluate whether the same thing may happen in humans," Vosshall says. "If so what happens to humans who can't get the communicate because they undergo the nonfunctional copy of the gene" Or the hyperfunctional one" What could be the social and sexual implications of this on one's perception of the smell of fellow humans""

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://vinnysa1store.blogspot.com/2007/09/why-men-stink-of-urine-or-vanilla.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


 

 




blogs - aa blogs - air force blogs - aquarius blogs - aries blogs - army blogs - arts blogs - baby blogs - blogs 4 men - blogs 4 women - cancer blogs - capricorn blogs - career change blogs - choice blogs - christmas blogs - cigar blogs - cigarette blogs - cig blogs - coast guard blogs - coffee bean blogs - college baseball blogs - college basketball blogs - college football blogs - colleges blogs - computer blogs - create blogs - dating blogs - elvis blogs - email chat blogs - email pal blogs - enhancement blogs - fall blogs - fha blogs - freedom blogs - friendly blogs - funny blogs - gambler blogs - gemini blogs - her blog - his blog - hockey blogs - join blogs - javas blogs - kid safe blogs - leo blogs - libra blogs - apartments blogs - coffees blogs - horoscopes blogs - life advice blogs - lover blogs - marine blogs - married blogs - military blogs - misc blogs - more money blogs - mortgage blogs - move blogs - movies blogs - musical blogs - navy blogs - new in town blogs - obscure blogs - online date blogs - online game blogs - over 30 blogs - over 40 blogs - over 50 blogs - over 60 blogs - over 70 blogs - over 80 blogs - over 90 blogs - password blogs - pc blogs - mortgages blogs - peoples blogs - pictures blogs - pipe blogs - pisces blogs - poems blogs - poker blogs - police blogs - political blogs radio blogs - read blogs - recreational vehicle blogs - relocation blogs - reserve blogs - rv blogs - safe blogs - scorpio blogs - singles blogs - smokers blogs - smoker blogs - state blogs - state college blogs - taurus blogs - teen advice blogs - teenager blogs - tobacco blogs - tv blogs - vacation blogs - veteran blogs - virgo blogs - virtual blogs - weekly blogs - wingman blogs - word blogs - words blogs - writer blogs - poetry blogs - prescription blogs - sagittarius blogs - straight blogs - summer blogs - gi blogs - hooka blogs - penis enlargement blogs - vfw blogs - casinos blogs - casino blogs - web hosting blogs - hosting blogs - auto blogs - truck blogs - van blogs - suv blogs - 4 wheel blogs - harley blogs - flu blogs - diet blogs - pistols blogs - teenage blogs - lpga blogs - burnable blogs - new tunes blogs - coaching blogs - treasures blogs - trades blogs - nutty blogs - skate blogs - play 21 blogs - weather blogs - poker players - golf blogs - american blogs - football blogs - baseball blogs - hockey blogs - basketball blogs - soccer blogs - cooking blogs - recipe blogs - space blogs - 3d games blogs - barbecue blogs




the humans archives:

11 articles in 2006-01
22 articles in 2006-02
27 articles in 2006-03
36 articles in 2006-04
27 articles in 2006-05
26 articles in 2006-06
24 articles in 2006-07
18 articles in 2006-08
23 articles in 2006-09
30 articles in 2006-10
22 articles in 2006-11
22 articles in 2006-12
12 articles in 2007-01
12 articles in 2007-02
3 articles in 2007-03
7 articles in 2007-04
11 articles in 2007-05
10 articles in 2007-06
3 articles in 2007-07
1 articles in 2007-09




next page


humans